Changelog

Changes and corrections to the analyses and sample documents, by version.

Version 1.10, October 2026. Cases were checked in Westlaw, including KeyCite history and pin cites, and statutes and regulations against official sources, in October 2026. Legal information, not legal advice; check every citation before relying on it. How citations are checked · Changelog.

Changes to the analyses and sample documents, by version. Corrections are listed with the issue or form they affect.

Version 1.10 (October 19, 2026)

New Part H, Abduction and experiencers, with four issues. H1 covers the law that would apply if NHI take and injure people: criminal law with no reachable defendant, the government’s duty to protect, the Invasion Clause, crime victim compensation, and the evidence rules on hypnotically refreshed memory. H2 covers accounts of people taken, held, or tested by military, intelligence, or contractor personnel, built on the MKULTRA, Edgewood, and rendition cases. H3 covers government surveillance, infiltration, and disruption of UFO groups and experiencers, compared with COINTELPRO, Operation CHAOS, Army surveillance, and campus and church cases, with the Privacy Act remedy for records of First Amendment activity. H4 covers UFO and abduction reports treated as evidence of mental illness and how credibility, competency, commitment, custody, and records should be handled now. Five new forms: a victim compensation statement and appeal letter (H1-1), a Privacy Act and FOIA request for detention and research records (H2-1), a Privacy Act request to expunge records of First Amendment activity (H3-1), a motion in limine (H4-1), and a letter to an evaluator with a health-record amendment request (H4-2).

Version 1.9 (October 18, 2026)

Word downloads laid out as the real documents. Each sample document’s Word file now uses the format its kind of paper uses in practice. Court papers (A1-1, A1-2, A2-2, A3-1, E3-1, E6-2, F1-1, F1-2, F3-1) are on 28-line pleading paper with a caption table and a footer title. Federal model statutes (A4-1, B3-1, D6-1, E6-3, F2-1, F7-1) are set as an introduced bill, with a cover page, the enacting clause, and line numbers that restart on each page; the state model act (F7-2) is set as a state bill. Letters, requests, agreements, and policies have letter and document layouts. Every file opens with an instructions page, to be deleted before use, and ends with the drafting notes. Section headings in several model statutes, such as “SEC. ___. SHORT TITLE.”, now display correctly on the web pages.

Version 1.8 (October 17, 2026)

New Issue F7, Safe-harbor zones for contact. The analysis explains what a private host can and cannot do to protect a place where humans and NHI meet, the state and federal law that could add protection, and how to avoid the appearance of diplomacy or governmental authority. Four new forms: a model federal Peaceful Contact Zones Act (F7-1), a model state act (F7-2), a host’s declaration, site charter, and code of conduct (F7-3), and a notice letter to the FAA and the Department of War (F7-4). Issues F2 and F3 now refer to F7.

Version 1.7 (October 17, 2026)

New form F1-2. A state-court habeas petition for a non-human being held by a contractor that claims to hold it on its own account. It relies on state statutes that reach restraint by private persons (California Penal Code §§1473-1474; Nevada Revised Statutes §34.360) and asks the custodian to say whether it claims federal authority, so that either answer keeps the case in a court. Issue F1 and Form F1-1 now cover contractor custody, next-friend standing, habeas discovery, and the limits on where a court can order release. Issues C4 and C5 note that the Zaid appeal was argued on May 14, 2026. Issues F2, A1, and E2 now explain how custody by a contractor is challenged, why a contractor cannot invoke the state secrets privilege itself, and why intellectual property in information learned from a being gives no claim to the being.

Version 1.5 (October 17, 2026)

Citations updated before launch. Every case citation on the site has been run through KeyCite. The district court holding in EPIC v. NSA that a tightly held presidential directive is not an agency record was vacated by the D.C. Circuit in 2014, and Issue A2 and Form A2-1 now say so. Geospatial Technology Associates v. United States is on appeal to the Federal Circuit (Issues A1 and E2). Cisco Systems v. Doe I is now cited to the United States Reports (609 U.S. 141). Forms B3-1 and B3-2 note the modification of United States v. North on rehearing.

Version 1.4 (October 17, 2026)

Case law added. Issue D7 now covers AIR21 decisions on protected activity, proof, and psychiatric referrals (Petitt v. Delta, Robinson v. Northwest, Ameristar, Hoffman v. Solis, Continental Airlines v. ARB) and preemption of state claims (Ventress). Issue C5 now covers judicial review of clearance decisions across the circuits (Lee v. Garland, Hegab, El-Ganayni, Rattigan) and DOHA Appeal Board decisions on mental health evidence and falsification. Form A1-2 has an alternative Part III for cases in the Fourth Circuit. Forms C5-1 and D7-1 have new drafting notes. Further reading added to Issues A1, D1, and D4.

Version 1.3 (October 17, 2026)

New analyses. Issue C5, security clearance practice for UAP witnesses, experiencers, and researchers; Issue D7, pilots and aircrew who report UAP.

New sample documents. Form A5-3 (data-use agreement for government sensor data), Form C5-1 (answer to a DOHA Statement of Reasons), Form D1-2 (request for a committee vote to release information under S. Res. 400 §8 or House Rule X cl. 11(g)), and Form D7-1 (pilot’s letter to an air carrier under AIR21).

Reader aids. Added key-points summaries at the top of every analysis; reading paths by role; a deadlines table; four scenario walkthroughs; a glossary; a case and bill tracker; a table of authorities; and “when to use” and deadline notes on every sample document.

Working premise. The site now states as a working premise that AARO is a deliberate source of disinformation and part of the concealment. The analyses keep the AARO channel for the statutory protection it gives and pair it with inspector general and congressional channels (Issues C1, C3, F4).

Corrections. - Issue A1: Herring v. United States is now described correctly (the privilege claim was held not to be a fraud on the court). - Issue C1: the statute on mental-health referrals as reprisal is DoD Instruction 6490.04 and DoD Directive 7050.06; an earlier draft cited the wrong section of title 10. - Form F2-1: the “No immunity” section no longer purports to limit pardons, which Congress cannot do. - Issue E5 and Form E5-2: added Aircastle on government seizure under aviation war-perils exclusions.

New and expanded material. Among other additions: - Issue A3: timeline of enacted UAP provisions and a comparison of the House and Senate disclosure acts. - Issue B1: foreseeable-harm review, former officials’ statements, CIA operational files, and reverse FOIA. - Issue C4: security clearance hearings (DOHA, SEAD 4, the SF-86). - Issue D1: public release by committee vote under S. Res. 400 §8 and House Rule X cl. 11(g); 50 U.S.C. §3094. - Issue D3: false statements in reports required by law, major fraud, misprision, and special counsel. - Issue D4: AIR21, temporary flight restrictions, and NTSB investigations. - Issue D5: causation proof and the Camp Lejeune, PACT, RECA, and EEOICPA models. - Issue E4: Macquarie, the Item 1.05 delay model, and Regulation FD. - Issue E6: operability and the Navy’s inertial mass reduction patent. - Issue F1: foreign decisions on non-human legal persons and the Reparation advisory opinion. - Issues G1 and G2: recast for all publishers, with a track for publishers that are not law firms. - Forms: completed the Memorandum of Understanding (A1-1), statutory background (A3-1), the truth commission’s findings, redress program, and definitions (B3-1), the compensation procedure (D6-1), and the Review Panel (F2-1); added a state-by-state table (A4-2), follow-up letters (B4-1, C1-1), and deadline columns (C1-2).

Versions 1.0 to 1.2 (October 15-17, 2026)

First published draft of 31 analyses and 48 sample documents, followed by checks of the citations against the official reporters, codes, and a citator, with corrections to pin cites and case histories.

↑